Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 06:01
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
When reading can – and can't – help with mental health - BBC
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
When it's time to think about AI for recruitment process automation?
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How I Turned My Fitness Around with an Infrared Sauna Blanket?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Mars Orbiter Captures Rare View of Ancient Volcano Poking Above the Clouds - Gizmodo
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
The Undervalued Medical Power of Muscle - Medscape
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.